Gaming Community: We Need to Talk


August 18, 2013 by Devin

Gaming community, I want to talk about recent events, mainly revolving around the conversation about sexism in video games.

In case you do not remember or missed this controversy, Dragon’s Crown, recently released on the PS3 and PS Vita, caused quite a stir lately with its character designs. Most notably, its design for the Sorceress has gotten quite a bit of attention, for obvious reasons.

Very obvious reasons.

Very obvious reasons.

The Sorceress has breasts that seem like they are trying to jump out of her minuscule top, her hind-quarters take up a quarter of her body, and I do not even want to know what is going on with that skeleton.

That design spurred a lot of controversy when Kotaku published an article criticizing the obvious pandering to male audiences, the artist responded back with a gay joke, and then they all made up and Kotaku got an article about sexism out of it.

Now, I have seen a lot of the debate take place over the internet, and it has always been worrying and stressful to me. It seems a lot of gamers do not care that this women is sporting a ridiculously-huge rack, but if they did care, they make a point to say that this type of exaggeration is just part of the game’s art style.

“Look, it’s obviously not supposed to be taken seriously, and in reality, the men are just as exaggerated as the females”.*

(In short, it is not a problem, but if it was a problem, it would be just as big a problem for the male side, so it is not sexist)

I understand where these gamers are coming from. It is hard to take something like this seriously when it is so exaggerated, and furthermore, it is hard to understand why it is a problem when it is not directly affecting us. What is happening is that male gamers are going, “I’m not offended by this similar problem, so why would women care?”

Ultimately, like a lot of other situations, I think this disconnect comes down to a fundamental misunderstanding of what women want.

For comparison’s sake, let’s look at the design of the Dwarf, one of the male characters.


Now, the Dwarf is also exaggerated to the point of absurdity. He has muscles that look like they were built out of granite and a beard that looks like it could house another beard within it. The Dwarf also looks awesome, like he could beat the crap out of anybody that got into his way. It is almost as if the artist looked at Thor and thought, “What a sissy!”

But what the Dwarf is not is sexualized. This Dwarf looks like he was built for battle and not much else (he also seems to be missing sexual anatomy). Would women really find this appealing?

What is common between the Sorceress and the Dwarf is that they both look like they fit well into the adolescent male power fantasy, but out of place in any female power fantasy. Is the Sorceress really what little girls aspire to be when they grow up in the same way that little boys aspire to be strong heroes like the Dwarf?**

If the exaggeration of the male characters was truly just like the exaggeration of the Sorceress, I feel like the male characters would be incredibly different. There have been a lot of male figures that serve to get the adoration of the female population, but they have rarely, if ever, been anywhere close to the Dwarf.

Now I am not saying that Dragon’s Crown is a bad game. In fact, based on the reviews, it looks like a game that I would really like. But I am tired of hearing gamers stick their heads in the sand and act like there is nothing wrong with this art style. Yes, it is gorgeous. Yes, it is exaggerated. And yes, it is heavily reminiscent of Dungeons and Dragons tropes that are much loved in the gaming community, but none of those things make it immune to criticism.

If we could acknowledge that we understand why people would not like this art style, that it is sexist, then we could move on and enjoy the game (or not) at our own leisure. And hopefully, this acknowledgement would lead to more games that everyone can enjoy in the future.

But as long as the gaming community continues to fight this losing battle, as long as the gaming community continues to take a reactionary approach to sexism instead of a combative approach, the community will be holding games, as a medium, back.

And we should understand that our power fantasies are not everyone’s power fantasies, and therefore we should not be baffled when they are offended by them.

Actually, this gives me an idea. Dragon’s Crown should release DLC to really appease the female populace, really show them that they want their support as well. I am thinking that they release a character shown to be sensitive, strong, and a heart throb. This character design might uninterest male gamers, but that would be the point, wouldn’t it? I am imagining a character that draws from the gothic origins of fantasy, one that is about seduction and the terrors of the night.

Now that's what I'm talking about.

Now that’s what I’m talking about.


*Please trust me that I’m not using a straw-man argument. I have seen this argument multiple places and it is even referenced in the article I linked to.

**I’m using strongly gendered language here, but I don’t want to imply that these stereotypes are true for all scenarios. I only mean to say that the Dwarf and Sorceress fit better into an adolescent male power fantasy than anything else.

2 thoughts on “Gaming Community: We Need to Talk

  1. Triacom says:

    Wait a minute, the dwarf isn’t sexualized? Look at that drawing, specifically where his “armour” stops, and you notice that he’s not wearing armour, it’s just painted on his skin in plenty of screenshots you can see he’s not wearing anything besides boots, belt, and skirt.
    Incidentally, they do have a character for the female audience, it’s the baby faced fighter, who (as far as I’m aware) is what you’ve described, give him makeup, a hair cut and hair dye and his face would look just like Edwards there.
    Yes I know that the fighter is in full body armour, but there’s also plenty of pictures of others barely wearing anything.
    You’re also acting as if the sorceress is the only female character you can play, and you’re completely ignoring the elf, who’s the exact opposite of the sorcerer.

    Overall, it looks like you’ve just found something that you didn’t like/were offended by, and stopped there, without looking any deeper into the rest of the game, so to try to make a joke you demanded what the game already has.

    • Devin says:

      Hey Triacom, thanks for commenting!

      I was aware of the other characters, including the Elf (who is wonderfully designed and not objectified at all unlike the Sorceress and the Amazon) and the Fighter, but I did not find them incredibly relevant. I do think that the art style is, in general, sexist, as the Elf is the exception, not the rule (though looking back, I probably should have at least mentioned this character and that this is an example of doing it right).

      I also think you’re off in your pushing of the Dwarf and the Fighter as sexualized. Yes, the Fighter is baby-faced (even though in gameplay his face is completely covered up), but even if I concede that that could be appealing to women, there is nothing else about him that works like that.

      For example, neither the Dwarf nor the Fighter have any sort of butt at all. I mean, look at this: It’s barely there, and the same goes for the Dwarf. And similar to the Dwarf, it’s doubtful that he has sexual genitalia at all. Women like butts, and if these characters are going to be overtly sexualized, they should have overt sexual anatomy.

      Just about every characteristic that these characters have that is sexualized is also common with male power fantasy, and those features that are not are not included. That’s not sexualization. That’s coincidental sex appeal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Click here to follow my posts via email.

Join 368 other followers


The Good Greatsby

Paul Johnson's comedy blog: I didn't get into comedy to be rich or famous. All I've ever wanted was to be somebody rich and famous.

%d bloggers like this: